Posts tagged as:

Big News

car-017

Our trusty Subaru sustained more than $5,000 worth of damage tonight in a hit and run that occurred right in front of the  RVP World Headquarters near 46th Avenue South and South Othello sometime between 8:30 and 10:30pm Friday.

While there didn’t appear to be any witnesses to the crash, responding officers said that they had just impounded a damaged Lexus nearby – one of their “regulars” – that was reported to have been driving recklessly earlier in the evening.

They noted the Sub’s damage, skid marks in the street and what appeared to be pieces of the suspect’s vehicle surrounding the crash zone, and suggested that we contact our insurance agency.

Photo/do communications, inc.

{ 4 comments }

mikalatreedown

By Mikala Woodward, Rainier Valley Historical Society

Yes, it’s true — one of Columbia Park’s big leaf maples went down in Tuesday night’s storm. By 8am Wednesday morning, Parks crews had arrived to assess the damage. By 8:45 they had cordoned off the area and were feeding branches off the fallen trunk into a wood chipper.

mikala3treechipping

An arborist determined that the storm wasn’t to blame. It turns out the tree was fatally flawed: two stems had long ago grown together into a single tree, but with a layer of included bark between them that made the bond weak. With all the decay revealed around the split, nobody seemed terribly hopeful about saving the remaining half of the tree.

treesplit1

We’re not really sure when the three big leaf maples were planted outside the Columbia Library — there aren’t many pictures of the park in the early days, possibly because it was an unsightly garbage dump until 1939. The trees were already big by the 1940s and ‘50s, but big leaf maples grow pretty fast.

babytreescropped1

A 1915 photo shows a wooded slope north of the half-finished library building – are those the big leaf maples in their youth?

library1915

Could be. It’s also possible they were planted later that year when the slope was graded as part of the realignment of Rainier Avenue.

Rainier’s realignment created a triangle of disputed land at the northeast corner of the park, and in the 1960s a proposal was floated to build an office building at the corner of Rainier and Alaska. The plan called for the removal of several old trees at the site, and Don Sherwood, Parks Department historian, protested: “We don’t have thirty years to grow new trees!”  I’m glad the plan was scrapped – I love the sweep of the park coming up from Rainier. But I think it’s important to note that new trees do grow, and they’ve got nothing but time to do it in. Our fatally flawed friend narrowly missed the Centennial Tree we dedicated in Columbia Park in 2007; it won’t be long – in tree time — before that little big leaf catches up with its elders.

Final thought: that realignment of Rainier back in 1915 cost Columbia City a beloved street tree, which stood in front of Phalen’s grocery (now the Columbia City Bakery). The tree doesn’t look all that big in the old photos, but it had a circular bench around the trunk, and people used to sit there eating ice cream while they waited for the streetcar. When Rainier was widened to add a brick-paved road, the tree was in the way and had to be cut down. A sentimental soul took the wood and made souvenir goblets for everyone in town. We’re hoping to persuade the Parks Department to help us preserve the trunk of the big leaf maple for a commemorative project of some kind – I vote for wooden goblets all around. Then we can stand under the remaining big leaf maples and drink to their health. Bottoms up!

Top Three Photos/Mikala Woodward. Bottom Two Photos/Rainier Valley Historical Society

{ 4 comments }

rbburglaries3From Yalonda Gill Masundire, Rainier Beach Community Block Watch

Important Alert!
Please note that there were three homes that were burglarized on Tues., May 19, on 57th Avenue South between Roxbury and Fletcher in the middle of the day. The suspect(s) was not apprehended; however, an alert neighbor was able to call 911 and report a suspicious male of African-American descent in his 20′s and approx. 150 pds outside of the homes that were burglarized.

Important Things to Remember:
In an effort to combat this ongoing problem, it is important to know your neighbors, share contact information, contact 911 if ever you see anything suspicious (don’t hesitate or second guess your instincts), make sure to lock all doors and windows, ask your neighbors who are at home during the day to keep an eye on your property and to report anything strange or anyone lurking around. Consider investing in a home security system and always arm your alarm system when leaving home. In addition, remember to make an inventory list of your personal property (electronic equipment, anything of value, etc.) and make sure to label your items by engraving information on each item that will identify that it is yours.

What Can Be Done?
Next Thur., May 28, at the May Rainier Beach Community Block Watch Meeting, we will discuss how as a community, we can increase our efforts to stamp-out crime and to work together to help address this problem. Rainier Beach Presbyterian Church (9656 Waters Avenue S.) Lower Level at 7pm.

{ 2 comments }

rpz

Next week, the City Council’s Transportation Committee will hold a public hearing on proposed changes to the Restricted Parking Zone program (AKA Residential Parking Zone program) which was developed to help ease parking congestion in residential neighborhoods. The meeting will take place at City Hall (600 4th Ave.) in City Council Chambers (2nd floor) Wed., May 27, at 5:30 pm, where the committee will take public comment on the proposed amendments:

  • Manage parking demand by limiting permit sales to 4 per household with the exception for adult family homes, assisted living facilities, domestic violence shelters, and permitted congregate residences
  • Modify the business pilot to explicitly limit it to the seven Central Link Light Rail Stations and not allow its expansion to other RPZs; to establish a trigger point beyond which permits for non-residents would cease to be issued in order to keep parking demand from exceeding available on-street parking spaces in residential areas; and to set a time frame for evaluating and deciding whether or not to continue the pilot
  • Change the threshold for establishing an RPZ to 35% non-resident vehicles to favor parking for residents while still allowing for an increase in visitor parking
  • Not approve the Executive’s limit on major institution support for RPZ permits costs for affected households; instead leave in place determination of level of major institution support for RPZ permits to negotiations as part of the master plan update process
  • Modify the Executive’s proposal to include additional public involvement approaches
  • Add a requirement for a public hearing prior to decisions on RPZs by the Seattle Department of Transportation Director; and clarify that appeals process applies to establishing, modifying, or dissolving an RPZ
  • Not approve the Executive’s limit on major institution support for RPZ permits costs for affected households; instead leave in place determination of major institute support for RPZ permits to the negotiation process as part of the master plan update process
  • Create a new Resolution stating Council’s intent to have the Seattle Department of Transportation report back to City Council on January 1, 2011 on how the changes to the RPZ program have affected neighborhoods and what additional tools are available to manage RPZ permits

If all that gives you a headache, you might hop over to Smarter Neighbors where they’re breaking it down for the rest of us:

Great! If the city has its way and limits the number of Residential Parking Zone permits each household can obtain to just eight, where am I going to park my five broken-down Celicas, four pickups, three friend’s cars, two daily drivers, and my huge moldy RV?!? Huh? Tell we me where?!?

On the other hand, some are asking:

Is the city using what seems like a no-brainer reduction in the number of permits issued to each household as an excuse to slide through other changes that would negatively impact neighborhoods?

The counterpoint to the city’s message has been that the city isn’t just making changes to this one point, but they are completely restructuring the whole Residential Parking Zone program. And critics charge that the impact will be that these residential spaces are going to be replaced by commercial parking (so there’s really no reduction in car traffic) that residents will lose their ability to help setup the boundaries of these Residential Parking Zones, and that the city is making it harder to establish new Residential Parking Zones in the future. Read more.

What do you think?

Photo/do communications, inc.

{ 1 comment }